author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-06-28 16:53:05 -0700
committer: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2021-06-28 16:53:05 -0700
commit: 233a806b00e31b3ab8d57a68f1aab40cf1e5eaea
parent: 122fa8c588316aacafe7e5a393bb3e875eaf5b25
Commit Summary:
Diffstat:
2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst
index 845eee659199..1fc73555f5c4 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Quota and period are managed within the cpu subsystem via cgroupfs.
.. note::
The cgroupfs files described in this section are only applicable
to cgroup v1. For cgroup v2, see
- :ref:`Documentation/admin-guide/cgroupv2.rst <cgroup-v2-cpu>`.
+ :ref:`Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst <cgroup-v2-cpu>`.
- cpu.cfs_quota_us: the total available run-time within a period (in
microseconds)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-nice-design.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-nice-design.rst
index 0571f1b47e64..889bf2b737dc 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-nice-design.rst
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-nice-design.rst
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ within the constraints of HZ and jiffies and their nasty design level
coupling to timeslices and granularity it was not really viable.
The second (less frequent but still periodically occurring) complaint
-about Linux's nice level support was its assymetry around the origo
+about Linux's nice level support was its asymmetry around the origin
(which you can see demonstrated in the picture above), or more
accurately: the fact that nice level behavior depended on the _absolute_
nice level as well, while the nice API itself is fundamentally